Amogh N P
 In loving memory of Amogh N P — Architect · Designer · Visionary 
AERB Compliance for Radiology & Imaging Rooms: Architect's Working Reference
Healthcare Architecture

AERB Compliance for Radiology & Imaging Rooms: Architect's Working Reference

Atomic Energy Regulatory Board Codes for Diagnostic Radiology, Mammography, CT, Cathlab, MRI, Nuclear Medicine, and Radiotherapy — Barrier Calculation Principles, Lead-Equivalent Specification, Door & Viewing Window Design, RSO Appointment, Layout Approval Process, and Per-Room Architectural Detail

28 min readAmogh N P25 April 2026

The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) is the central regulator for all use of ionising radiation in India — diagnostic, therapeutic, industrial, and research. For the healthcare architect, AERB compliance is one of the most technically demanding regulatory layers: every X-ray machine, every CT scanner, every cathlab, every nuclear-medicine room, and every radiotherapy bunker must be designed to a calculated barrier specification, approved by AERB before construction, and re-licensed periodically thereafter. The technical depth of barrier calculation is genuinely the domain of the radiation safety officer (RSO) and physicist — but the architectural translation, room geometry, door and viewing window design, and the integration of shielded surfaces into the building fabric is the architect's direct responsibility.

This guide is the eighth in the ten-part series. It assumes the reader has read the pillar reference, the facility-type guides, the NBC Group C-1 reference, the CEA state variations guide, and the NABH decoded guide.

The guide is organised by modality. For each modality, it covers the AERB regulatory references, the room geometry and minimum dimensions, the shielding specification, the door and viewing-window design, the console-room arrangement, and the architectural integration with the broader building. The guide is not a substitute for the AERB Safety Code or the RSO's barrier calculation; it is the architect's working bridge between the radiation physics and the building drawing.

"The lead in the wall is invisible. The error in the lead is visible only when the patient or the staff member becomes ill. By that time, the building is already built." — Anonymous senior radiation safety officer at a Delhi tertiary hospital, paraphrased

"The principle of ALARA — As Low As Reasonably Achievable — is not a slogan. It is a design discipline that begins in the architect's first sketch of the X-ray room and ends only when the building is decommissioned." — National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) Report 147, paraphrased


1. AERB Regulatory Framework — The Architect's Reading List

AERB DocumentScope
AERB/RF-MED/SC-3 (Rev. 2)Safety Code for Medical Diagnostic X-Ray Equipment and Installations (general radiology, fluoroscopy)
AERB/RSD/CAT-MED/RT/G-2Radiation Safety Manual for Radiotherapy
AERB/RSD/CT-RAD-1Safety Manual for CT Scanner Installations
AERB/RSD-DR/G-1Mammography Safety Code
AERB/RSD-DR/G-2Dental Radiology Safety Code
AERB/RSD/NM/SAFETYNuclear Medicine Safety Manual
AERB/SC/RP/2018Radiation Protection Rules (consolidated)
e-LORA portalOnline Licensing of Radiation Applications — submission, renewal, RSO registration
AERB Type ApprovalEquipment-specific approval; manufacturer responsibility
AERB Layout ApprovalRoom-specific approval; user / architect responsibility

The architect's submission to AERB is the layout approval — a drawing showing the proposed room with shielding specifications, equipment placement, console / control area, and adjacent occupancies. The approval must be in hand before construction of the shielded room.


2. Barrier Calculation — The Underlying Physics

A radiation barrier is dimensioned by three primary inputs:

InputDefinitionArchitectural Influence
Workload (W)Total radiation output per week (mA·min/wk for X-ray; Gy/wk for therapy)Higher workload → thicker barrier
Use factor (U)Fraction of workload directed at the barrierBeam direction in plan determines U; floor / ceiling / walls have different U
Occupancy factor (T)Fraction of time the adjacent space is occupiedPublic area T = 1.0; adjacent ward T = 0.5; control room T = 1.0; uncontrolled corridor T = 0.5; staff toilet T = 0.05
Distance (d)Distance from radiation source to point of interestInverse-square reduction; longer distance → thinner barrier
Permitted dose (P)Annual dose limit at point of interestPublic area 1 mSv/yr; controlled area 20 mSv/yr (occupational)

Architectural implication: the architect can reduce shielding requirements by increasing distance (room depth, separation from adjacent occupancy) and reducing occupancy (placing the X-ray room next to a corridor or stair rather than a ward). A well-planned X-ray room reduces shielding cost dramatically — a poorly-placed one inflates it.

The full calculation methodology is in NCRP Report 49 (legacy), NCRP Report 147 (current diagnostic), and NCRP Report 151 (radiotherapy). AERB safety codes adopt these formulae.


3. General Diagnostic X-Ray Room

ParameterSpecification
Minimum room area (excluding console)18 m² (some references 16 m²)
Minimum dimension4 m × 4 m typical
Ceiling height≥ 3.0 m (for ceiling-mounted tube travel)
Wall barrier — standard workload1.5–2.0 mm Pb equivalent (or equivalent concrete / brick)
Floor / ceiling barrierOften satisfied by 150 mm RCC slab
DoorMinimum 2 mm Pb; manual or motorised
Viewing window — control to room2 mm Pb-equivalent leaded glass
Console roomMinimum 6 m² with viewing of patient
Patient changing cubicles2 minimum, ≥ 1.2 × 1.5 m each
Floor finishVinyl with welded seams
Wall finishPVC or epoxy washable
Radiation warning signAt entry; "X-Ray In Use" illuminated
Door interlock"X-Ray On" indicator outside
Cable conduitsSealed at penetration

Architectural integration: locate the X-ray room with at least one external wall (allows lower-occupancy adjacency), away from wards (reduces T), with patient access from OPD and a separate (or shared) console viewing of the patient. The console serves multiple X-ray rooms in larger hospitals via a shared lead-shielded corridor.


4. Dental X-Ray and OPG (Panoramic)

ParameterDental X-Ray (intraoral)OPG (panoramic)
Minimum room area6 m² (small machines); 9 m² typical12 m²
Wall barrier1.0 mm Pb equivalent typical1.5 mm Pb equivalent
Door1.0–1.5 mm Pb2.0 mm Pb
Viewing windowOptional; if console outside2 mm Pb leaded glass
Operator positionBehind 1 mm Pb shield or outside roomBehind 1.5 mm Pb shield or outside room
Patient chairCentred in roomStanding or seated; OPG arm requires clear arc
Hand-held dental X-rayRequires AERB type approval; operator position protocol

Common dental architectural failure: under-shielded operatory walls when dental clinic is in apartment/retail conversion. AERB applies regardless of building type — every dental X-ray triggers shielding.


5. Mammography

ParameterSpecification
Minimum room area9 m²
Wall barrier1.0 mm Pb equivalent (lower-energy radiation than general X-ray)
Door1.0 mm Pb
Viewing window1.0 mm Pb leaded glass with privacy screening
Console positionInside same room behind partial shield, or outside
Patient changing cubicleAdjacent, with privacy access to room
Floor finishVinyl welded
Special noteLow-energy spectrum; designed shielding less than general X-ray; but full barrier calc still required

6. CT Scanner

ParameterSpecification
Minimum room area30 m² scanner room + 15 m² console + 15 m² equipment / preparation
Ceiling height≥ 3.0 m (gantry clearance + ceiling-mounted equipment)
Wall barrier — primary2.5–3.0 mm Pb equivalent (or 200–300 mm RCC + lead lining)
Floor / ceilingUsually 150 mm RCC slab + lead sheet
Door3 mm Pb-equivalent motorised
Viewing window3 mm Pb-equivalent leaded glass (large)
Console roomMinimum 12 m²; full visual control of scanner
Equipment / coolantSeparate room for chiller, UPS, equipment cabinet
Floor loading800–1500 kg/m² scanner area; structural design
Cable trenchFloor trench from console to scanner
Anaesthesia capabilityIf procedures with anaesthesia, ASHRAE 170 + medical gas + scavenging
Patient observation windowMandatory
Emergency stopMultiple locations

Architectural integration: CT rooms are heavy (scanner ~ 2 tons); structural slab must be designed. Site CT near service core for chiller / equipment access. Provide separate patient-prep area with cannulation chair and recovery if contrast IV used.


7. Fluoroscopy Room

ParameterSpecification
Minimum room area24 m²
Wall barrier2.5 mm Pb equivalent
Door2.5 mm Pb
Viewing window2.5 mm Pb leaded glass
Operator behindLead shield within room, or outside via console
Special proceduresBarium swallow, IVP, hysterosalpingogram — toilet adjacency for barium examination
Toilet adjacencyRequired for GI procedures

8. Cathlab (Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory)

ParameterSpecification
Minimum room area50–60 m² procedure room + 20 m² control + 20 m² equipment + 15 m² recovery
Wall barrier2.5–3.0 mm Pb equivalent
Floor / ceiling200 mm RCC + lead sheet typical
Door3 mm Pb-equivalent motorised; multiple accesses
Viewing windowTwo large windows — operator to patient, observer / family
Control roomEquipment console + monitors; separated from procedure room
Equipment roomGenerator, RF cabinet, image storage
Recovery / step-down4–6 trolleys; cardiac monitoring
AnaesthesiaMobile capability; AGSS if regular
Emergency cardiac responseAdjacent ICU or transfer protocol
FlooringConductive vinyl welded
Ceiling-mounted boomAnaesthesia boom + surgical boom; structural slab loading
HVACOT-grade for sterile cathlab; minimum 20 ACH; HEPA

Cathlabs are de facto small operation theatres with imaging — the architectural complexity equals an OT plus shielded room.


9. MRI — A Different Physics, Different Architecture

MRI does not use ionising radiation, so AERB ionising-radiation safety codes do not directly apply. However, MRI rooms have their own architectural requirements driven by magnetic fields and RF.

MRI ElementSpecification
Minimum room area30–40 m² scanner room + 15 m² console + 25 m² equipment + 15 m² preparation
Faraday cage / RF shieldingFully shielded (continuous copper or steel sheet); RF-tight door; viewing window with RF screening
Magnetic field exclusion5-gauss line marked; equipment / personnel restrictions inside
Quench ventHelium quench vent from cryostat to roof; minimum 10 cm diameter; insulated; all-weather
Magnetic shieldingRequired if 5-gauss line extends to occupied space; passive (steel) or active (electromagnetic) shielding
DoorRF-tight; non-ferrous hardware; manual or pneumatic
Viewing windowRF-shielded glass with copper mesh
FloorVinyl welded; non-ferrous
Equipment / chillerSeparate room for magnet cooling, gradient cooling, computer cabinet
Patient prep / changingOutside Faraday cage; ferrous-screening pre-screening
Emergency rundown unitQuench button at door
Magnet delivery routeBuilding structure must allow magnet delivery (3–6 ton), often through removable wall panel or roof

The MRI room is the most architecturally idiosyncratic imaging space — the magnet delivery, quench vent, and Faraday cage are once-only design decisions that cannot be retrofitted.


10. Nuclear Medicine — PET-CT and Gamma Camera

ParameterGamma CameraPET-CT
Minimum room area20 m²30 m²
Wall barrier1.5 mm Pb (low-energy)5–10 mm Pb (511 keV photons)
Floor / ceilingOften satisfied by RCCHeavy concrete; lead sheet
Hot lab12 m² with shielding for radioisotope handling18 m² with shielding
Hot lab fume hoodLead-shielded glove-box for unit-dose preparationSame
Patient injection roomLead-lined seating; uptake roomSame
Patient toiletDedicated; delay-decay to sewageDedicated; delay-decay
Decay storageLocked; separate from main BMWSame
Storage of isotopesLead-lined safeSame
Generator (Mo/Tc)Lead-lined; eluate handling
Cyclotron (if on-site PET)Bunker; significant shielding
Patient flowInjected patient is "hot" — separate flow from ambient

Nuclear medicine is one of the most regulatorily complex modalities — radioactive isotopes have storage, transport, and disposal requirements beyond the imaging room itself.


11. Radiotherapy — Linear Accelerator (Linac) Bunker

The most architecturally consequential AERB-regulated space.

Linac Bunker ElementSpecification
Minimum bunker area (treatment room)50–70 m²
Bunker height≥ 3.5 m
Primary barrier walls2.0–2.5 m thick concrete (or equivalent) for primary beam direction
Secondary barrier walls0.8–1.5 m thick concrete
CeilingPer beam workload; 1.5–2.5 m concrete
FloorSlab + barrier as per workload
Maze entryLong L- or U-shaped corridor to attenuate scatter; replaces shielded door
Door (where used instead of full maze)Heavy lead/steel; motorised; 200–400 mm thick
Console roomOutside bunker; 15 m² typical
Closed-circuit TVPatient observation throughout treatment
Audio communicationTwo-way
Emergency stopMultiple
Beam-on warning lightsAt all entry points
Door interlockTreatment cannot proceed if door open
Air handlingFiltered ventilation; activation of bunker air after high-energy treatment
Equipment hoistHeavy bunker doors require service hoist
Linac delivery routeConstruction-stage planning for delivery

Linac bunkers are typically located at ground floor or basement, with the primary beam direction toward an external boundary or earth-bermed face. The bunker construction is itself a major engineering exercise — typically 25–35% of the radiotherapy facility's total construction cost.

Brachytherapy

ParameterSpecification
Treatment room20–30 m²
Wall barrierPer source — 50–200 mm lead equivalent (HDR Ir-192 typical)
Source storageLead-lined safe; logged access
Patient stayBrachytherapy may involve overnight stay with implant — shielded suite
Operator positionBehind shield; remote afterloader

12. Layout Approval Process (e-LORA)

StepActionArchitect's Role
1Project conceptionPlace imaging modalities in plan
2Equipment selection (with vendor / hospital)Confirm machine type for AERB type-approval reference
3Engage RSO / qualified physicistArchitect coordinates with RSO
4Barrier calculationRSO calculates per NCRP 147 / 151
5Layout drawings preparedArchitect prepares scaled plan + section
6Submission via AERB e-LORALayout drawings + RSO calc + equipment specs
7AERB reviewTypically 30–90 days
8AERB layout approval letterApproval to proceed with construction
9Construction with shieldingQuality control during shielding installation
10Pre-installation surveyPost-construction radiation survey by RSO
11Installation of equipmentVendor commissioning
12Post-installation AERB licenceSurvey report submitted; AERB licence issued
13RenewalPeriodic per AERB regulations

The architect's deliverables in the AERB pack: scaled plans of the room with all dimensions; section showing barriers (wall thickness, ceiling, floor); door and window specifications; surrounding occupancy plan with T values; equipment placement; console / operator positions; identification of primary beam direction.


13. RSO Appointment & Responsibilities

Radiation Safety Officer appointment is mandatory for any AERB-licensed facility. The RSO is typically:

  • A medical physicist (M.Sc. Medical Physics + AERB certification) for tertiary hospitals with multiple modalities
  • A qualified radiologist (DMRD or DNB Radiology with RSO orientation course) for diagnostic-only facilities
  • A radiotherapy oncologist or physicist for radiotherapy

The RSO's responsibilities — relevant to architects:

  • Barrier calculation
  • Pre-installation survey
  • Periodic re-survey
  • Personnel monitoring (TLD badges)
  • Incident response
  • Liaison with AERB

The architect coordinates with the RSO from concept stage; an RSO engaged after the building is constructed will discover shielding errors that are expensive to correct.


14. Per-Room Architectural Checklist

#ItemAll AERB Rooms
1Equipment selected and AERB type-approval referencedConcept
2Room geometry (length × width × height) per AERB minimumConcept
3Adjacent occupancy mapped with T valuesConcept
4Primary beam direction identifiedConcept
5RSO engaged; barrier calculation producedSchematic
6Walls — Pb equivalent specifiedSchematic
7Floor / ceiling barrier specifiedSchematic
8Door — Pb specifiedSchematic
9Viewing window — Pb specifiedSchematic
10Console / operator position designedSchematic
11Layout submitted to AERB e-LORADetailed
12AERB layout approval receivedPre-construction
13Construction with shieldingConstruction
14Cable / pipe penetrations sealed without compromising shieldingConstruction
15Door interlock and warning lights installedConstruction
16Pre-installation survey by RSOCommissioning
17Equipment installationCommissioning
18Post-installation surveyCommissioning
19AERB licence applicationCommissioning
20AERB licence receivedPre-operation

References

  • AERB (2016) Safety Code for Medical Diagnostic X-Ray Equipment and Installations. AERB/RF-MED/SC-3 (Rev. 2). Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board.
  • AERB (2018) Atomic Energy (Radiation Protection) Rules — Consolidated. Mumbai: AERB.
  • AERB (2018) Safety Code for Dental Radiology. Mumbai: AERB.
  • AERB (2018) Mammography Safety Code. Mumbai: AERB.
  • AERB (2017) Safety Manual for CT Scanner Installations. Mumbai: AERB.
  • AERB (2017) Radiation Safety Manual for Radiotherapy. Mumbai: AERB.
  • AERB (2018) Nuclear Medicine Safety Manual. Mumbai: AERB.
  • IAEA (2014) Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards (GSR Part 3). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  • ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (Publication 103). Oxford: ICRP / Elsevier.
  • NCRP (1976) Report 49: Structural Shielding Design and Evaluation for Medical Use of X-Rays. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection (legacy reference).
  • NCRP (2004) Report 147: Structural Shielding Design for Medical X-Ray Imaging Facilities. Bethesda: NCRP.
  • NCRP (2005) Report 151: Structural Shielding Design and Evaluation for Megavoltage X- and Gamma-Ray Radiotherapy Facilities. Bethesda: NCRP.
  • IPEM (1997 / latest) Medical and Dental Guidance Notes — A Good Practice Guide on All Aspects of Ionising Radiation Protection in the Clinical Environment. York: Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
  • Bushberg, J.T., Seibert, J.A., Leidholdt, E.M. and Boone, J.M. (2020) The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Hendee, W.R. and Ritenour, E.R. (2002) Medical Imaging Physics. 4th edn. New York: Wiley-Liss.
  • Kron, T., Lehmann, J. and Greer, P.B. (2016) 'Dosimetry of ionising radiation in modern radiation oncology', Physics in Medicine and Biology, 61(14), pp. R167–R205.
  • Sharma, S.D., Datta, D., Kannan, A. and Mayya, Y.S. (2017) 'AERB approach to radiation safety in medical applications', Indian Journal of Medical Physics, 42(2), pp. 65–72.

Author's Note: AERB documents are revised periodically. The architect should verify the current version of each safety code and the e-LORA portal's current submission requirements before any layout submission. Barrier calculation is the responsibility of a qualified RSO / medical physicist; this guide provides the architectural translation, not the calculation itself.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, or professional architectural or radiation-physics advice. AERB compliance for a specific facility depends on the equipment, workload, surrounding occupancy, and current AERB requirements. Always engage a qualified RSO / medical physicist and submit to AERB before construction. Studio Matrx, its authors, and contributors accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of the information in this guide.

Export this guide